Bruce’s Beach Bill Passes State Senate – NBC Los Angeles

on Jun2
by | Comments Off on Bruce’s Beach Bill Passes State Senate – NBC Los Angeles |

A bill to return a scenic beachfront property in Manhattan Beach to the descendants of a Black couple who once operated a vibrant resort there was unanimously approved Wednesday by the state Senate.

The Bruce’s Beach bill now goes to the state Assembly for approval. The long-awaited legislation would return the property to the Bruce family after nearly a century.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously April 20
to direct the county’s CEO to come up with a plan to return the property. That step was required to make the land transfer possible.

The county-owned portion of the property has a lifeguard training center, but restrictions on the land mean it cannot be returned to the Bruce family unless the state legislation is approved.

The public seizure of the Bruce’s Beach property has long stained the history of Manhattan Beach, particularly in the past year amid a nationwide reckoning on racial injustice.

Willa and Charles Bruce purchased land in 1912 for $1,225. They eventually added some other parcels and created a beach resort catering to Black residents, who had few options at the time for enjoying time along the California coast.

Complete with a bath house, dance hall and cafe, the resort attracted other Black families who purchased adjacent land and created what they hoped would be a ocean-view retreat.

But the resort quickly became a target of the area’s white populace, leading to acts of vandalism, attacks on vehicles of Black visitors and even a 1920 attack by the Ku Klux Klan.

The Bruces were undeterred and continued operating their small enclave, but under increasing pressure, the city moved to condemn their property and other surrounding parcels in 1924, seizing it through eminent domain under the pretense of planning to build a city park.

The resort was forced out of business, and the Bruces and other Black families ultimately lost their land in 1929.

The families sued, claiming they were the victims of a racially motivated removal campaign. The Bruces were eventually awarded some damages, as were other displaced families. But the Bruces were unable to reopen their resort anywhere else in town.

Despite the city claiming the land was needed for a city park, the property sat vacant for decades. It was not until 1960 that a park was built on a portion of the seized land, with city officials fearing the evicted families could take new legal action if the property wasn’t used for the purpose for which it was seized.

The exact parcel of land the Bruces owned was transferred to the state, and then to the county in 1995.

The city park that now sits on a portion of the land seized by the city has had a variety of names over the years. But it was not until 2006 that the city agreed to rename the park “Bruce’s Beach” in honor of the evicted family. That honor, however, has been derided by critics as a hollow gesture toward the family.

Previous postSouthern California home prices jump $1 every 2 minutes – Daily News Next postAllergen Labels Not Required on All Foods, Making it Tricky or Dangerous for Some Shoppers – NBC Los Angeles

Los Angeles Financial times

Copyright © 2024 Los Angeles Financial times

Updates via RSS
or Email